What is generally allowed (not frowned upon) Īnything that purely uses the data itself to iterate on said data - e.g. The line becomes quite clear and much less fuzzy. Understanding the algorithms you apply a bit better will answer such questions. And AI based post-processing is closer to this in my perception. recovering hidden data, and didn't 'create' something new? But in the extreme, we would frown at if someone do 'post processing' by painting dots on his pictures to beautify. Why this is acceptable while AI based processing is not? Is it because StarTool is number/data based processing, a.k.a.
This falsely gives the viewer wrong information that they can achieve small and defined star with the equipment. Even usage is opened, it's hard to tell how much is 'captured' and how much is 'AI synthesized'.īut StarTools has star mask and toolbox for 'Star shrink'. One of the criticism about AI based processed image is that it can falsely give the hope about the level of detail and sharpness as achievable with the effort and equipment where those are actually 'effortlessly' created by AI, if usage was hidden. If you compare this to Revision B on my Abin page you can see how this latest revision doesnt destroy the stars and turn them into little points of light. Also I have some halo issues, but that is another issue I am working to refine from another part of my processing. Still needs some refining perhaps as it certainly is easy and tempting to push hard with the software. I then added the stars back and the result is quite compelling. I did a process on an image using LeadWeights technique of separating stars, and DeNoising the starless.
#Topaz denoise ai color shift software
I had an exchange with support from Topaz and it was told to me that in DeNoise the only AI algorithm that has had astrophotography image training is "Low Light." So it is possible that details are added if the software is pushed too much, but those would be artifacts from terrestrial AI training, not the inclusion of nebular information. Earlier in this discussion there were some concerns expressed about AI adding details in and how the AI could conceivably add data that wasnt capture if it had been trained with astro-images.
An interesting tidbit in case you are wondering.
0 kommentar(er)
